A Pragmatic Analysis of Compliment and Compliment Responses in YouTube Comments开题报告

 2022-07-30 15:01:50

1. 研究目的与意义

At present, most of the corpus usedin the study of compliments and their responses at home and abroad come fromnatural conversation recordings and film and television literary works, andthe background is mostly confined to the two-party communication mode in thenatural context. There is a lack of research on compliments and complimentsin multi-party communication in virtual environment. This paper studies thecompliments and their response discourse behavior in the medium of Youtube.Through the analysis, it is concluded that besides the explicit and implicitcompliments in the natural context, there is also a symbolic compliment withoutwritten language. At the same time, in the framework of ‘acceptance,mitigation, avoidance and refusal’ proposed by Pomerantz, the complimentresponse in Youtube comments is carefully studied in combination with theprinciples of consistency, modesty and harmony.

2. 研究内容和预期目标

Internet has become anindispensable item of modern life so it is important to know how network complimentsappear and the meaning of each compliment and compliment response. This canhelp us understand and use them while we communicate online.

1 Introduction

1.1 Introduction of Internet pragmatics

1.2 Introduction of Speech act theory

1.3 Introduction of Politeness principle

2 Research background

2.1 Complimentsand compliment responses

2.2 The Youtubecontext

3Data and methods

3.1 Data

3.2 Methodology

4 Analysis anddiscussion

4.1 Contextanalysis

4.1.1 The difference between traditional network media and Web 2.0social network

4.1.2The unique points of Youtube as a newInternet social platform

4.1.3Types and characteristics of compliments

4.2 Internet social actors and language agents

4.2.1Analysis of the speech act intention of the network speaker

4.2.2 The needs of network speaker

4.2.3 The characteristics of their Youtubecomments

4.2.4 The mental analysis of network speaker

4.3Interpretation of network discourse

4.3.1 Explanation of general comment

4.3.2 Explanation of networksymbol expression

4.3.3 Interpretation ofantonym terms

4.3.4 Explanation of punctuation marks

4.4Analysis of the process of interpreting the meaning of the network listener

4.4.1 The demand orientation of networklistener

4.4.2 The characteristics of their Youtuberesponses

4.4.3 The mental analysis of network listener

4.5Analysis of the application ofpoliteness principle

4.5.1 Case analysis

4.5.2 The difference of politeness principlein reality communication

5 Conclusion

3. 国内外研究现状

As the Internet becomes the mostimportant part of life in the 21st century, network language has graduallybecome an important subject of pragmatics. As a new generation of Internetsocial networking platform, video websites also have a unique phenomenon of speechbehavior. As early as 2011, Francisco Yus, a pragmatist, divided socialplatforms such as Twitter into Web2.0 network media, and YouTube, a videowebsite, is of great research value as an updated network media. The15th International Seminar on Pragmatics found a new multimodal study of politenessin this international network environment.

The main conversation of YouTubetook place in the comments and the reply to the commentary. Themost common discourse in the comments is undoubtedly the compliment andcompliment response. Compliment, known as ''sociallubricant'', has always been a popular research topic amongsociolinguists. Compliment, like thanks and greetings, belongs to thecategory of sociolinguistics and is a polite and formulaic speech act. Holmes(1988)holds that compliment is a speech act in which the complimentee evaluatespositively, explicitly or implicitly, the characteristics or appearance,achievement or performance, moral character and skills of the complimentedperson. The use of compliments and their responses reflectsthe behavioral quality and politeness norms of the speaker in reality and isthe external expression of the speaker''s basic quality and linguisticcompetence. From the perspective of the network, it can help us to study howthe speaker compliments others and how the complimentee responds and have abetter understanding of the values, social structure and the languagecommunity''''s perception of the function and meaning of language use.

Since Pomerantz took the lead inthe study of compliments and compliments'' response forms, scholars at home andabroad have studied compliments from different perspectives, such as Herbeg''sstudy of gender differences in the use of compliments and their responses todifferent genders, Lorenzo-Dus, Dumitrescu and others in different languages.Cross-linguistic comparative study, Rose and Ng, Cheng and other scholarsfrom the perspective of second language acquisition on the use of complimentsand their responses by first language learners and second language learners,as well as Xia Shan, Yin Caiyan, Lan Chun from the perspective ofcommunicative participants and so on. Therefore, whether from the perspectiveof its research or from the language involved, the study of compliments andcompliments in response to speech acts can be said to be quite adequate. Atpresent, most of the corpus used in the study of compliment use and responsecomes from natural context or literary, film and television works, whileYouTube, a social platform widely used by the public, has not received dueattention.

4. 计划与进度安排

1.2022年11月10日(本学期第十三周)——完成选题工作;

2.2022年11月30日前——完成开题工作;

3.2022年3月17日前——完成初稿和中期检查工作;

4.2022年5月5日前——完成论文修改、定稿;

5. 参考文献

[1] Francisco Yus.2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context.[2] Bousfi eld, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction .[3] 冉永平,2013. 多元语境下英语研究的语用关注. 《外语教学与研究》, (5), 669-680[4] Holmes. J. 1998. Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropologica1 Linguistics, (4),485- 508.[5] Yuan. Y. 2001. An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data- gathering methods:Written DCTs,oral DCTs,field notes,and natural conversations.Journal of Pragmatics, (33), 271- 292.[6] Pomerantz. A. 1978. Compliment responses:Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints.Jims. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. NewYork:Academic Press, 79- 112.[7] Herbert. R. 1990.Sex- based differences in compliment behavior.Language in Society, (19), 201- 204[8] Lorenzodus. N. 2001. Compliment responses among British and Spanish university students:A contrastive study.Journal of Pragmatics, (33),107- 127.[9] Dumitrescu. D. 2006. Noroc;Merci;Qu lindo!;Sorry:Some polite speech acts across cultures.Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 25 (2), 1- 37.[10] Rose. K. UR. 2001.Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses . Pragmatics in Language Teaching, 145, 145- 170.[11] Cheng. D. 2011. New insights on compliment responses:A comparison between native English speakers and Chinese L2 speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2204- 2214.[12] 夏登山,殷彩艳,蓝纯. 2017. 三方恭维回应策略研究. 外语教学与研究, (49), 688- 698

剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付 1元 才能查看该篇文章全部内容!立即支付

以上是毕业论文开题报告,课题毕业论文、任务书、外文翻译、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。